Skip to main content
Pinpoint
QA
Case Study

How Pinpoint Helped Adrata Achieve Perfect Lighthouse Scores

Pinpoint Team7 min read

Adrata is an AI-powered Revenue Orchestration Platform that helps enterprise sales teams map buyer groups and close deals faster. Founded by Ross Sylvester, Adrata gives CROs and sales leaders the ability to identify every stakeholder in a buying committee, then multi-thread outreach to the people who actually sign the check. As a founder selling to enterprise buyers, Ross understood that his website needed to project the same credibility his product delivers. A site with poor SEO or accessibility gaps would undercut the trust Adrata works to build with revenue leaders.

That is where Pinpoint came in. Ross engaged our team to run a full website quality audit, and what we found told a clear story: some areas were strong, while others had significant room for improvement.

Adrata homepage showing their Revenue Orchestration Platform
The Adrata homepage after implementing Pinpoint’s recommendations

What the Audit Revealed

Pinpoint ran a comprehensive Lighthouse audit against the Adrata website. The results showed a product site that performed well in raw speed but fell short in accessibility, best practices, and especially search engine optimization.

Before Pinpoint (Lighthouse scores)

CategoryScore
Performance100
Accessibility94
Best Practices93
SEO63

A performance score of 100 is excellent, but the other categories told a different story. An SEO score of 63 meant the site was leaving significant organic traffic on the table. For a company competing in the revenue orchestration space against well-funded players, that gap directly impacts pipeline generation and customer acquisition cost.

The Recommendations

Rather than delivering a vague list of suggestions, Pinpoint provided Adrata with a prioritized remediation plan. Each recommendation was specific, actionable, and ranked by impact. Here is what we advised.

Migrate hosting to AWS

The existing infrastructure introduced latency and reliability constraints that would become harder to manage at scale. Moving to AWS gave Adrata more control over caching, CDN configuration, and regional distribution, all of which contribute to sustained performance as traffic grows.

Separate the UI and API layers

The site architecture had the frontend and backend tightly coupled, which created deployment bottlenecks and made it harder to optimize each layer independently. By decoupling the UI from the API, the team could iterate on the frontend without risking backend stability, and vice versa.

Implement lazy loading

Images and below-the-fold content were being loaded eagerly, which added unnecessary weight to initial page loads. Implementing lazy loading ensured that users only downloaded what they could actually see, keeping the performance score high even as the site grew in content density.

Fix SEO fundamentals

The SEO score of 63 stemmed from several fixable issues: missing meta descriptions, improper heading hierarchy, absent structured data, and pages that were not properly indexed. These are not exotic problems. They are the basics that search engines expect, and fixing them unlocked substantial organic visibility.

Resolve ADA compliance issues

The accessibility score of 94 sounds close to perfect, but even small gaps in ADA compliance can exclude users who depend on assistive technology. Our audit identified missing alt text, insufficient color contrast ratios, and form inputs without proper labels. Beyond the ethical imperative, addressing these issues also reduces legal exposure under the ADA and WCAG guidelines.

The Results

After implementing Pinpoint’s recommendations, Adrata re-ran the Lighthouse audit. The results speak for themselves.

After Pinpoint (Lighthouse scores)

CategoryBeforeAfter
Performance100100
Accessibility94100
Best Practices93100
SEO63100

Every category reached a perfect 100. The SEO score jumped 37 points, the largest single improvement. Accessibility and best practices each reached the maximum as well, ensuring the site met the highest standards across the board.

Why This Mattered

Ross Sylvester does not have a dedicated QA team, a full-time SEO specialist, or an accessibility consultant on staff. What he needed was clarity: a single, prioritized list of problems with specific guidance on how to fix each one.

That is exactly what Pinpoint delivered. Instead of sifting through vague audit reports or trying to decode Lighthouse output on his own, Ross received a structured remediation plan that his development team could execute against immediately. No ambiguity, no wasted cycles figuring out what to fix first.

For growing teams, time is the scarcest resource. Having a clear roadmap meant faster execution, fewer wrong turns, and a website that now reflects the quality standard Adrata’s customers expect from the product itself.

The Takeaway

A website audit is not about chasing a number. It is about identifying the specific gaps that prevent your site from reaching its potential and then addressing them in the right order. Adrata’s journey from a 63 SEO score to perfect 100s across all Lighthouse categories demonstrates what is possible when you combine a systematic audit with focused execution.

If your website has similar gaps, or if you are unsure where your scores stand, Pinpoint can help. We run the same comprehensive audit we performed for Adrata and deliver a prioritized plan tailored to your site.

Ready to level up your QA?

Book a free 30-minute call and see how Pinpoint plugs into your pipeline with zero overhead.